833 (1992), to uphold state regulations on abortion. The test was later used by a plurality opinion in Planned Parenthood v. O'Connor utilized the test as an alternative to the strict scrutiny test applied in Roe v. Akron Center for Reproductive Health, 462 US 416 (1983). The standard was applied by Associate Justice Sandra Day O'Connor in her dissent in City of Akron v. More recently, the standard has been used in cases involving state restrictions on a woman's access to abortion. This is that the state legislation is invalid if it unduly burdens that commerce in matters where uniformity is necessary-necessary in the constitutional sense of useful in accomplishing a permitted purpose." "There is a recognized abstract principle, however, that may be taken as a postulate for testing whether particular state legislation in the absence of action by Congress is beyond state power. In a 7-to-1 ruling, Associate Justice Stanley Forman Reed fashioned an "undue burden" test to decide the constitutionality of a Virginia law requiring separate but equal racial segregation in public transportation. In short, the undue burden standard states that a legislature cannot make a particular law that is too burdensome or restrictive of one's fundamental rights. The test, first developed in the late 20th century, is widely used in American constitutional law. The undue burden standard is a constitutional test fashioned by the Supreme Court of the United States. ( August 2022) ( Learn how and when to remove this template message) Several templates and tools are available to assist in formatting, such as Reflinks ( documentation), reFill ( documentation) and Citation bot ( documentation). Please consider converting them to full citations to ensure the article remains verifiable and maintains a consistent citation style. This article uses bare URLs, which are uninformative and vulnerable to link rot.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |